I'm just left wondering why in his trick to solve it he has to apply a gamma correction to fix the image after going to 32 bits mode. But I know close to nothing about these technicalities. and that conversion between linear certain gamma (I think is from linear to gamma based, so, might be that his image was linear and once imported is applied a gamma, and then the banding happens?) can produce banding. What does this mean ? That this profile applies gamma of 1.0 (kind of removing gamma applied then ?). In that screenshot.He has a 32 bit sRGB profile the 32 bits field, but specifying (linear) in the name of the profile. I checked it, so, thought I'd put what I found as a side data or sth. But as mentioned, as the gradient shows smooth in other apps, seems unrelated, then. In a 6 bits you could have suddenly banding in situations you wouldn't expect ( I believe depends what's in screen at a time and other matters), and often not very predictable. A better scenario for gradients and other matters than 8, is 10 bits, years ago only seen in pro monitors, counting on display port to be able to use it (in the g. Typically means an almost 100% of sRGB coverage. Couldn't find anywhere if it is a real 8 bits panel or a 6 bits + FRC, I'd hate the latter, as is one of the specs that could trigger banding or noise in some cases. In all cases, IMO seems is a % of the NTSC space (so, 72% NTSC, nothing great, but can do), almost convinced of that. only a foot note says that 85 is according to CIE1976., while much more common (in monitors ads) is to refer to CIE1931, and that would mean the so very common 72% (said also in the tiny foot note). Color space support, it just says 85% color space support in certain PDF, without specifying the space. am always interested in mainstream monitors with high end performance, if only to recommend them) , It is a non professional monitor, but very nice for a mainstream: contrast is 1000:1. S2209W, right ? Out of curiosity ( fully unrelated, is obviously sth happening with a color profile there, but wanted to chime in, as I think is a nice monitor) checked the specs (triggered me the "sorry, your monitor sucks if so" D.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |